Infection Epidemic Carves Deadly Path

July 21, 2002

By Michael J. Berens
Chicago Tribune Staff Reporter
Copyright (c) 2002, Chicago Tribune

Infection Epidemic Carves Deadly Path

A hidden epidemic of life-threatening infections is contaminating America's hospitals, needlessly killing tens of thousands of patients each year.

These infections often are characterized by the health-care industry as random and inevitable byproducts of lifesaving care. But a Tribune investigation found that in 2000, nearly three-quarters of the deadly infections--or about 75,000--were preventable, the result of unsanitary facilities, germ-laden instruments, unwashed hands and other lapses.

The industry's stance also obscures a disturbing trend buried within government and private health-care records: Infection rates are soaring nationally, exacerbated by hospital cutbacks and carelessness by doctors and nurses.

Deaths linked to hospital germs represent the fourth leading cause of mortality among Americans, behind heart disease, cancer and strokes, according to the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. These infections kill more people each year than car accidents, fires and drowning combined.

Hospital infections often are preventable by adopting simple, inexpensive measures. Strict adherence to clean-hand policies alone could prevent the deaths of up to 20,000 patients each year, according to the CDC and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

"The number of people needlessly killed by hospital infections is unbelievable, but the public doesn't know anything about it," said Dr. Barry Farr, a leading infection-control expert and president of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. "For years, we've just been quietly bundling the bodies of patients off to the morgue while infection rates get higher and higher."

Hospitals provide ideal reservoirs for germs, with temperature-controlled environments and a steady stream of germ-carrying strangers pouring through the doors each day. Germs that wouldn't be harmful to healthy people in their homes or at work can turn deadly for patients too young, too old or too weak to fight the infection.

In Chicago in 1998, as fever-ridden health-care workers tended to patients and as others worked without always washing their hands, eight children died of an infection that spread from the Misericordia Home on the Southwest Side into a hospital. The flulike outbreak, which the city of Chicago never revealed to the public, was halted weeks later after three dozen sick health-care workers were ordered to stay home.

In a Detroit hospital, as doctors and nurses moved about the pediatric intensive care unit without washing hands, infections killed four babies in the same row of bassinets, according to court records and interviews. But it took three months for administrators to close the nursery for cleaning.

Staphylococcus germs thriving inside a West Palm Beach, Fla., hospital invaded more than 100 cardiac patients, killing 13, according to court records. The survivors underwent painful and debilitating surgery, as rotting bone was cut from their bodies.

The health-care industry's penchant for secrecy and a lack of meaningful government oversight cloak the problem. Hospitals are not legally required to disclose infection rates, and most don't. Likewise, doctors are not required to tell patients about risk or exposure to hospital germs.

Even a term adopted by the CDC--nosocomial infection--obscures the true source of the germs. Nosocomial, derived from Latin, means hospital-acquired. CDC records show that the term was used to shield hospitals from the "embarrassment" of germ-related deaths and injuries.

To document the rising rate of infection-related deaths, the Tribune analyzed records fragmented among 75 federal and state agencies, as well as internal hospital files, patient databases and court cases around the nation. The result is the first comprehensive analysis of preventable patient deaths linked to infections within 5,810 hospitals nationally.

The Tribune's analysis, which adopted methods commonly used by epidemiologists, found an estimated 103,000 deaths linked to hospital infections in 2000. The CDC, which bases its numbers on extrapolations from 315 hospitals, estimated there were 90,000 that year. The CDC links infections to patient mortality both directly and indirectly.

Direct cases typically involve patients who specifically died of complications caused by an infection. Indirect cases involve infections that played a major role in a patient's death, but may not have been the primary cause. Though CDC officials now say they believe most hospital infections are preventable, the agency has not arrived at a precise number.

The Tribune examined federal health inspection reports and other public documents from 2000--the latest year health-care records were available nationally--to estimate that 75,000 of the deadly hospital infections took place in conditions that were preventable. Deaths were considered preventable if patients contracted infections that were spread as the result of deficiencies documented by state, federal or health-care investigators.

For every death linked to an infection, thousands of patients are successfully treated each year. And many hospitals battle infections with diligence and the latest technology. But the Tribune investigation found that breakdowns occur more frequently than patients suspect and that the consequences often are deadly.

Government and hospital industry reports analyzed by the Tribune reveal that:

• Serious violations of infection-control standards have been found in the vast majority of hospitals nationally. Since 1995, more than 75 percent of all hospitals have been cited for significant cleanliness and sanitation violations.
  
  In thousands of cases observed by federal or state inspectors, surgeons performed operations without washing hands or wearing masks.
  Investigators discovered fly-infested operating rooms where dust floated in the air during open-heart surgeries in Connecticut. A surgical assistant used
  his teeth to tear adhesive surgical tape that was placed across an open chest wound during a non-emergency procedure in Florida.
  

• Hospital cleaning and janitorial staffs are overwhelmed and inadequately trained, resulting in unsanitary rooms or wards where germs have grown
  and multiplied for weeks, sometimes years, on bed rails, telephones, bathroom fixtures--most anywhere.
  
  Because of cost-cutting measures, U.S. hospitals have collectively pared cleaning staffs by 25 percent since 1995. During the same period, half
  of the nation's hospitals have been cited for failing to properly sanitize portions of their facilities, a shortcoming that can colonize new patients
  with lingering germs.
  
  
• Hospitals are required to have professional staffs devoted to tracking and reducing infections, but rampant payroll cutbacks have gutted those
  efforts. These staffs have been reduced an average of 20 percent nationally in just the last three years. Many hospitals disregard the CDC's
  recommendation of at least one infection-control employee for every 250 beds.
  
  For three months in 2000, for example, Illinois Masonic Medical Center closed down its infection-control efforts because of lack of staffing,
  federal inspection records show. The 507-bed North Side hospital now has new owners and has hired three infection specialists.
  
  The Tribune analysis of patient records shows that hospital-acquired infections contributed to or were the direct cause of death for at least
  four men and two women, ages 72 to 83, during the three-month period at Illinois Masonic. Four patients had respiratory infections; two had an
  infection that led to blood poisoning and caused inflammation of internal organs. Hospital officials said they could not verify the deaths based
  on the available information in state records, which omitted names.
  
  Federal inspectors determined at the time that Illinois Masonic had adopted a "complete disregard" for infection-control tracking. More recent
  inspection reports have found no problems with Masonic's infection-control program.

Since 1969, when U.S. Surgeon General William Stewart confidently told Congress that the nation could "close the book on infectious diseases," hospital infection rates have quietly pushed higher each year, registering a 36 percent increase in the last 20 years, according to CDC records. Today, about 2.1 million patients each year, or 6 percent, will contract a hospital-acquired infection among 35 million admissions annually, CDC records show.

The American Hospital Association said the last decade of unprecedented cost-cutting and financial instability has impacted all areas of hospital care, including infection control. Roughly a third of all hospitals are operating at a loss and a similar percentage are teetering on the edge of bankruptcy, according to the AHA.

"It's had an effect on infection control and it's had an effect on our ability to recruit and retain workers. It's had an effect on our ability to invest in new and updated equipment as much as we would like to," said Rick Wade, AHA executive vice president for communications. "It's also a question in front of society: How much do you want to invest in high-quality, safe medical care?"

Nurses, in particular, say staffing cutbacks have made the most basic requirements of their jobs difficult to fulfill, and a major study by the Harvard School of Public Health recently linked nurse staffing levels to hospital-acquired infections.

The national study of 799 hospitals found that patients were more likely to contract urinary tract infections and hospital-acquired pneumonia if nurse staffing was inadequate. The study projected that the widening nursing shortage could create even more problems, such as higher mortality rates.

"When you have less time to save lives, do you take the 30 seconds to wash your hands?" said registered nurse Trande Phillips, who works in San Francisco. "When you're speeding up you have to cut corners. We don't always wash our hands. I'm not saying it's right, but you've got to deal with reality."

Infection in an operating room

A deadly outbreak that swept through a Connecticut medical center in late 1996 reveals how washing hands or wearing clean clothes can be as critical to a patient's life as a surgeon's skill.

The outbreak, which received scant media attention, is detailed in thousands of pages of hospital records normally kept from public view but opened last year by the Connecticut Supreme Court after the hospital was sued. The case, which involves four patients who contracted infections inside Bridgeport Hospital, also exposes how the bottom line influences decisions that allow germs to flourish in what are supposed to be the most sterile quarters in a hospital.

Operating Room 2, where up to one in five patients in 1997 contracted infections, epitomized the hospital's problems.

The air often was contaminated by dust because of faulty ventilation, hospital records show. Flies buzzed overhead during open-heart surgery. Doctors wore germ-laden clothes from home into the operating room. Many never washed their hands.

Gloria Bonaffini, 71, was wheeled into Operating Room 2 in December 1996 for what doctors considered routine coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Doctors told Bonaffini that she would be back home within the week, her husband recalled. Instead, an infection burrowed into her sternum, and she remained hospitalized for more than a year.

"I asked a nurse what was wrong with Gloria," said her husband, Phil Bonaffini, 73, who later sued the hospital. "The nurse looked at me and very quietly said, `She has the infection.' "I asked, `What infection?' but the nurse ran away."

On her 448th day in the hospital, Gloria Bonaffini died. Her death certificate indicated that heart problems had killed her. But medical records showed the presence of a staphylococcus germ.

She contracted staphylococcus sometime during surgery, and symptoms of high fever and nausea began to flare within four days, hospital records show. The germ and resulting infections attacked most organs in her body and ultimately caused her heart to fail, records show.

Staphylococcus is typically spread by touch and is commonly found on the skin and nasal passages of healthy people. Most staph infections are minor, but for a heart patient, the bacteria can have grim consequences because they infect a person who already is weakened and often invade deep inside the chest during surgery.

To gain access to the heart, doctors slice the sternum bone, a process known as cracking the chest. Germs carried by contaminated hands or instruments can become embedded in the bone before the sternum is fused back together. Removing contaminated bone often stunts the spread of infectious germs. However, in many cases, the germ can never be fully eradicated, hiding in the body and potentially flaring up weeks or years later.

Bridgeport Hospital had wrestled with issues of infection control and deadly germs even before Bonaffini was operated on.

"Bridgeport had a long history of high infection rates, but corrective action was not taken until it was too late," said attorney Peggy Haering, who represented Phil Bonaffini. "What became clear is that these infections were preventable."

In 1995, hospital officials hired a respected nursing organization to survey the facility after a dozen patient infections were linked to unsanitary conditions. As a result, the Association of Perioperative Registered Nurses drafted a comprehensive report detailing a dozen deficiencies and specific improvements.

However, many recommendations were ignored, court and hospital records show. The report's primary recommendation--and the most expensive to implement--called for replacing the air filtration system in Operating Room 2. Yet, the $20,000 repair price was deemed too costly at the time, hospital records show.

Between October 1996 and January 1997, four other patients died "with probable hospital acquired" staph germs, according to a hospital memo obtained by the Tribune. The memo doesn't link the deaths directly to the germ, but in two of the cases, it contributed to the patient's "illness" or "demise," according to the memo.

The infections at Bridgeport didn't always kill. Dozens of patients survived but with a lifetime of pain, hospital and court records show.

In January 1997, during cardiac bypass surgery in Operating Room 14, Eunice Babcock, 59, became infected with staphylococcus. Doctors later removed much of Babcock's sternum, and the operation left deep, disfiguring scars on her chest. Doctors had to take her abdominal muscles and fold them over her chest cavity for protection.

That procedure has impaired her ability to walk more than 20 yards without collapsing.

Even as Gloria Bonaffini hovered between life and death in a coma, doctors at Bridgeport Hospital voted on April 21, 1997, against testing all patients for infection because it was not "cost effective," according to minutes of a meeting by the hospital's infection-control committee obtained by the Tribune.

Instead, the hospital decided to wait until patients showed symptoms before initiating tests and treatment, the records showed. At one point, hospital officials discussed the possibility of moving each infectious patient to a private room. But the infection-control committee decided the cost of more private rooms was prohibitive, internal hospital records show.

Doctors and nurses assigned by administrators to examine the problem were shocked by what they found, court and hospital records show.

A hidden camera was installed outside Operating Room2, and the tapes revealed that up to half of doctors, primarily surgical residents from Yale University, did not wash their hands before entering the operating room, according to hospital records.

Operating rooms should be secured and sterile during surgeries, but nurses and doctors routinely stepped inside Room2, even while open-heart surgery was under way, to make personal calls on a phone mounted on the wall.

Doctors also are supposed to change from street clothes into clean scrub outfits in a changing room at the hospital, but many doctors wore the scrubs home and back into the hospital the next day--and then directly into the operating room.

Officials at Bridgeport Hospital, which settled the suits related to the outbreak for an undisclosed amount, acknowledge they could have been more aggressive in fixing known problems.

"Nobody here intentionally spread germs, but we've learned that even the smallest breakdown in infection control can have devastating consequences," said hospital spokesman John Capiello.

The non-profit, 665-bed hospital has undergone a $30 million remodeling in recent years. Improvements include updating air filtration systems in operating rooms;
more patient isolation rooms; motion-sensitive sinks with timed release of water to encourage proper hand scrubbing; and waterless-soap dispensers for cleaning hands quickly. Doctors are never allowed to wear scrubs to work from home. The telephone in Operating Room 2 is off limits to anyone but the surgical staff.

As a result, infection rates that once soared to 22 percent of cardiac surgery patients have been brought down to nearly zero during most months, according to the hospital. The Tribune verified the lowered infection rates with public health authorities and through independently obtained hospital records.

On its Web site, Bridgeport provides a clear warning about infections, a voluntary practice seldom adopted by hospitals and almost never with an acknowledgement that many cases are preventable.

"Naturally, there are germs present in hospitals--treating germs is part of our mission! Therefore, it is possible to get sick from a stay in the hospital. Hospital-acquired illnesses are a major concern, especially since one-third to one-half of acquired infections may be preventable," reads the Web information.

Bridgeport's battle with deadly germs belies the contention that infections are inevitable, said Dr. Zane Saul, director of infectious diseases at Bridgeport. "We aren't doing anything new today," Saul said. "We're just doing what we should have been doing all along."

Germ warfare

In the 1840s, a Hungarian-born physician, Ignaz Philipp Semmelweis, stood in a Vienna auditorium before his medical peers and proffered a controversial theory: Washing hands saved lives.

When treated by doctors with unwashed hands, pregnant women often developed fatal infections following hospital births, but mothers rarely contracted infections if doctors thoroughly scrubbed their hands with soap and water, his groundbreaking study found.

European doctors quickly embraced the soap-and-water regimen--the Semmelweis technique. Infection rates plummeted immediately. U.S. doctors debated the procedure for an additional two decades.

By the end of the century, however, America developed a hospital system second to none, in part through an obsession with cleanliness. Prevention became a life-or-death necessity because almost any infection could kill.

But by the 1950s, the widespread use of penicillin and other antibiotics allowed doctors to overcome once-lethal infections, and over the decades, prevention gradually became less of a priority. New generations of doctors have grown accustomed to responding to symptoms--wait until the patient is sick, prescribe a drug.

Within the average U.S. hospital today, about half of doctors and nurses do not wash hands between patients, a dozen recent health-care studies show.

The direct observations of federal and state inspectors in recent years underscore the carelessness that threatens patient health. In Baltimore, inspection records show, a doctor placed his stethoscope on the chest of a sweaty patient in the grip of pneumonia, then walked to another room and placed the unwashed, moist device on the chest of a patient. The patient developed pneumonia.

In Loyola University Medical Center in Maywood, a resident physician dropped a surgical glove on a dirty floor, picked it up, put it on his hand and changed the bloody dressing on the open wound of a burn patient. The hospital told inspectors that it has retrained the resident and others on its staff.

All hospitals are required to adopt general infection-control standards to qualify for the federal Medicaid program, but each facility is allowed to draft its own rules on everything from potency of drugs to eradicating germs.

Most hospitals, for instance, leave catheters connected to patients because CDC studies show that even daily removal exacerbates infection rates. But a few hospitals still work under the misguided belief that changing needles every 24 hours avoids infections, studies show.

A checkerboard of local, federal and private health-care regulations does little to force hospitals to step up infection control. Most violations are quickly resolved by a hospital's promise to provide more training, federal records show.

"Can you imagine the medical community outcry if even a single doctor died from germs because of a failure to wash hands?" said Mark Bruley, a forensic investigator who studies hospital conditions for ECRI, a non-profit laboratory near Philadelphia. "Health-care workers aren't the ones getting hurt. Because they don't always see the outcome, they are blind to problems."

There is little incentive and, often, little time for doctors and nurses to comply with even basic standards.

Nurses and other health-care workers complain that it's virtually impossible to wash hands between every patient contact, which could number 150 times or more a day in a busy hospital. A recent study showed nurses would spend 2 1/2 hours each day to wash hands thoroughly with disinfectant and water. Additionally, frequent washing causes the skin to dry out and crack.

Consequently, most hospitals have begun to use a waterless disinfectant that kills germs and instantly dries on hands. Nurses can squeeze the solution on their hands from wall dispensers and continue to the next patient as their hands are cleaned. Studies show the waterless system kills germs as effectively as soap and water. However, many nurses fail to adopt even this simple measure, hospital inspection reports show.

The sanitary condition of a hospital also depends on the diligence of its housekeeping staff, but in many facilities those staffs are poorly trained and overburdened. Since 1995, federal inspectors have cited 31 Chicago hospitals for failure to properly sanitize rooms between patients, mirroring problems found in half of hospitals nationally.

"Hospitals hire people and say just go in there and clean," said Pia Davis, president of a Chicago health-care chapter for the Service Employees International Union. "They don't show them what chemicals to use or not to use. We have report after report showing that rooms are not cleaned every day."

Still, in some hospitals, there is a growing awareness that germs need to be fought with more than the latest drugs--that hospital sanitation, patient monitoring and infection tracking are key to saving lives in a never-ending battle.

"What is needed is not more antibiotics," said Dr. Gary Noskin, chief of infection control for Northwestern Memorial Hospital, which has some of the nation's lowest infection rates.

He attributes the hospital's success to rapid detection of germs and aggressive treatment of infections. "These bugs are so smart," he said. "They have been here a million years before we were here and they'll be here a million years after we're gone."